Search for: "Union Pacific Railroad Company"
Results 81 - 100
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
Company’s Remedial Measures Despite finding that no hostile work environment existed, the Court briefly described the measures that Union Pacific Railroad took upon learning of Miller’s allegations – steps that helped the company avoid liability. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:49 pm
Despite finding that there was not a hostile work environment, the court briefly described the measures Union Pacific took after learning of Miller’s allegations—steps that helped the company avoid liability. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:06 am
Union Pacific Railroad Company, the plaintiff was the mother of the young man who was killed. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:01 am
These jobs include those in surface transportation (with trucking companies and railroads), warehouse work, longshore and dock work, and Port administration jobs. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 10:04 am
Omaha now has 4 Fortune 500 companies left, and one of them, Union Pacific Railroad, has been eliminating jobs recently as well. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:18 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., July 13, 2015, Kanne, M.). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am
An employee who is represented by a union has the right to request and have a union representative present at an investigatory interview that he/she reasonably believes may result in disciplinary action. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
Union Pacific Railroad Co., ARB No. 13-034, ALJ No. 2010-FRS-30, (ARB Mar. 20, 2015) (en banc). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Union Pacific Railroad Co., ARB No. 13-042, ALJ No. 2012-FRS-17 (ARB Mar. 20, 2015). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., ARB No. 15-030, ALJ No. 2014-FRS-59 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015) Final Decision and Order Dismissing Complaint PDF Summary: The ARB dismissed the Complainant’s administrative FRSA complaint because it received notice that the Complainant had filed a de novo action in the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Department of Transportation (DOT) announced with its agencies, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), a package of targeted actions that will address some of the issues identified in recent train accidents involving crude oil and ethanol shipped by rail. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:05 am
Union Pacific Railroad Company, ARB Case No. 13-034 NWC Amicus brief in Powers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
(See e.g., Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Union Pacific Railroad Company, ARB Case No. 13-034. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:41 am
Union Pacific Railroad Company, ARB Case No. 13-034. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:12 am
Otros clientes importantes de la firma han incluido la Union Pacific Railroad y Pacific Gas and Electric Company. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Southern Pacific Railroad Company, el Tribunal Supremo federal había manifestado que las corporaciones son personas para propósitos de la Enmienda 14 de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos y merecen las mismas protecciones. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Turning to three Fremont alternatives, the opponents noted that two were problematic, but challenged the rejection of one on the basis that it would have required Union Pacific right of way acquisition (noting that the lead agency contemplated such right of acquisition for the Peninsula portion.) [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:25 am
Union Pacific Railroad Company, No. 13-35356. [read post]
