Search for: "Unit Fashion, Inc" Results 261 - 280 of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
IMB+ Records Inc. 2013 ONSC 5382 http://t.co/8X5y5upZuQ -> Philip Pullman: illegal downloading is 'moral squalor' http://t.co/2aWCK5sNej -> Search engine indexing files fair use says court in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm by WIMS
Defendants included: American Electric Power Company, Inc., American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southern Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Corporation. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 9:35 am by Scott H. Kimpel
A number of these actions involved old-fashioned Ponzi schemes masquerading as token offerings. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Fossil, Inc., involving whether willful infringement is a requirement to seek an award of an infringer’s profits in a trademark infringement suit. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 9:42 pm
It claims to own federal registrations for REPORT: for women’s shoes, REPORT for women’s and girls’ footwear, and ONE ON 1 BY REPORT for women’s and children’s fashion shoes.Topline alleges defendants first introduced their women’s apparel line in the United States at a trade show in September 2006, and have only manufactured and sold a limited number of women’s goods in the U.S. under these… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The civil antitrust case in the Northern District of Illinois, Maplevale Farms Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Beth Graham
Disputing would like to thank Paul Lurie, partner at Schiff Hardin, LLP’s Chicago office for bringing In re the Subpoena Issued to Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc., No. 29A05-1008-MI-489, (Ind. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
The protection of intellectual property is at the forefront of agreements between nation-states because of the relative ease of copying, and the lax attitude of some nation-states to prevent and punish infringement.[2] A prevailing argument is the thesis that "technology drives investment" and to the extent that technology is reluctant to flow where it is not protected, the lack of an adequate level of protection could stunt technological transfer and foreign investment… [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
  New Relists Arlene’s Flowers Inc v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:20 am by South Florida Lawyers
United Auto:Dear United Auto, you are about to receive Maximum Schwartz:The insurance company makes no defense, as it could not, of the merits of the order under review. [read post]