Search for: "United States Forest Service" Results 1 - 20 of 1,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:23 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that for more than forty years, the United States Forest Service (hereinafter Forest Service) has granted Plaintiff Hugh B. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
The panel affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings the district court's judgment in an action challenging the United States Forest Service's decision to designate over two million acres of public land in the Beaverhead-DeerlodgeNational Forest for use by winter motorized vehicles.Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm by WIMS
United States Forest Service, 469 F.3d 768, 772 (9th Cir. 2006) (Pit River I). [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 11:54 pm
United States Department of Agriculture, (9th Cir., Aug. 27, 2007), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a decision by the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Although the Service manages the surface of the ANF for the United States, mineral rights in most of the ANF are privately owned. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:33 pm
The Weeks Act is responsible for creation of the National Forests in the Eastern United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
The High Court dismissed a the case [See WIMS 6/21/12] which had said the Forest Service's EIS inadequate after the Pacific Rivers Council abandoned its claim against the  Forest Service. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:06 pm by Paul Weiland
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona entered summary judgment (pdf) for the United States Forest Service in a case filed by Defenders of Wildlife and other plaintiffs alleging the Forest Service failed to fulfill its duty to conserve under section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm by WIMS
The United States Forest Service (the Service) proposed the Smith Creek Project (the Project) in the Gallatin National Forest to reduce the risk of severe wildfire, to reduce the risk of insect infestation and disease, and to promote habitat diversity. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, HCPC or plaintiffs) brought suit against the United States Forest Service (Forest Service or Service), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to retain the original map of the Wilderness in violation of the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. ยง 460gg(b); (2) that the… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, HCPC or plaintiffs) brought suit against the United States Forest Service (Forest Service or Service), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to retain the original map of the Wilderness in violation of the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]