Search for: "United States v. Jamison"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 10:48 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Jamison v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:48 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Jamison v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:23 am
McCrary v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Judge Reeves assumes that whether an officer's physical intrusion into a car is reasonable is governed by a Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Jamison et al v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Jamison et al v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Jamison E. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 5:32 pm
Cargill, AFPD (Roanoke)B.S. 1978 United States Military Academy (2nd in class)J.D. 1984 University of Virginia1985-1991 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:36 am
There were several amicus curiae briefs filed, three of which are worthy of note: the amicus brief of the United States, the amicus brief of Hague Conventions delegates Jamison Selby Borek & James Hergen and finally, the amicus brief filed by Linda J. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
Now, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, has issued a new opinion in a related matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
Now, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, has issued a new opinion in a related matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
Now, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, has issued a new opinion in a related matter. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:07 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSuppression Denied Despite Wiretap Applications' Misidentification of Controlled Substance as Khat United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
