Search for: "United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
S. 1, 10 (1972); see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
In that same footnote, Justice Stevens also quoted United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
" Under the current presidential succession statute, the Speaker of the House and Senate President Pro Tempore follow the Vice President in the line of succession. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 10:44 am
” Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Bias response and the First Amendment The highest-profile case is undoubtedly Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
Sept. 27, 2010) (denying motion to enjoin merger of United Air Lines and Continental Airlines), aff’d, 434 F. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
(D.); VillaromanR. v. [read post]
