Search for: "United Coal Co. v. Land Use Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
(United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
Because it found that the regulation was not a categorical taking, the district court found that it was subject to the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am
Supreme Court (Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am
In the most famous and first partial regulatory takings case, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
(Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In 2012, the City entered into an agreement with CBAC Gaming, LLC (CBAC Gaming) to develop a tract of land, approximately 8.58 acres, for use as a casino and ancillary facilities. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
See US Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
The discussion in Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
" Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
Land-Use Agreements: Department of Veterans Affairs Needs to Improve Data Reliability and Monitoring GAO-14-501: Published: Aug 18, 2014. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The Fifth Circuit abandoned its own prior precedent, see Texports Stevedore Co. v. [read post]