Search for: "United Food v. Wal-Mart" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 2:00 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Consider the United Food and Commercial Workers’ war on non-union grocery stores like Wal-Mart. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
This morning’s papers across the United States are covered with paralyzed, former dancer, Stephanie Smith’s battle against food giant, Cargill. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
What is happening to the Peer-to-Patent project in the United States? [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
The Wal-Mart Trampling is still making news. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
About 446 unit employees have Chinese surnames and were born in mainland China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Kids Hope United, Inc.filed 05/23/07 1:07-cv-02906American Taxi Dispatch, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
 28, 2007. *** River Ranch Fresh Foods, LLC (32-CA-19938; 351 NLRB No.15) Salinas, CA Sept. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
The judge, noting that this is the second case against the Respondent, found that a broad order was warranted under Hickmont Foods, 242 NLRB 1357 (1979), based on the Respondent's proclivity to violate the Act. [read post]