Search for: "United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Consumer Class Plaintiffs" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
July 23, 2018) (putative class action removed from state court to federal court alleging defendants, which meter and measure water and sewer utility for individual units in multi-unit complexes, overcharged plaintiffs for their use of water and sewer utilities in violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and other state law) Pryor, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
Practice Tip: A 2006 opinion from the Federal Circuit, AERO Products International, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Conversely, if plaintiffs could import the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance into non-securities contexts – such as consumer fraud/common-law fraud/warranty litigation against our drug/device clients – an invasion of class actions would follow like night follows day.It’s hardly surprising that, because we don’t want class actions certified against our clients, we’re not big fans of “fraud on the… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Peter Breslauer
Quoting from its opinion in In re Horizon Healthcare Services Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
Itri’s nationwide practice has focused on representing plaintiffs in various settings — including securities and consumer class actions; antitrust; and cases involving patient harm. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
Itri’s nationwide practice has focused on representing plaintiffs in various settings — including securities and consumer class actions; antitrust; and cases involving patient harm. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm by Seeger Weiss LLP
Itri’s nationwide practice has focused on representing plaintiffs in various settings — including securities and consumer class actions; antitrust; and cases involving patient harm. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Cozad Trailer Sales, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court W D Washington finds knife trade dress functional, dismisses claim: Plaintiff Great Neck Saw Manufacturers, Inc v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm by Law Lady
Stat. 764h(a), requires health insurers to cover the behavioral analysis services provided by private schools to children with autism spectrum disorders.Billing Fraud: DOCTORS, PHARMACISTS AMONG 26 CHARGED IN $37 MILLION BILLING FRAUD SCHEME, United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Infrasource Services, Inc., No. 12-60159, (5th Cir. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Compared to this type of gamesmanship, removal before service is bush league. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
In a consumer diacetyl exposure case (claiming bronchiolitis obliterans), a federal district court excluded Egilman’s causation opinions as unreliable. [read post]