Search for: "United Railroads v. San Francisco"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, which held that the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”) does not preempt CEQA for a new railroad project, and that the State of California, as the railroad operator, could opt to subject itself to CEQA review without conflicting with the ICCTA. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
Several months prior to City’s approval of the Project, the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board) informed City that sampling had been conducted at the project site going back to 2009. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. 22-252Issue: Whether, under Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
City and County of San Francisco PC 596/2 47 6/15/22 21-234 George v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
City and County of San Francisco PC 596/2 47 6/15/22 21-234 George v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:00 am
A controversial law in San Francisco, known as the “Queue Ordinance,” was successfully challenged in 1873. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
DOORDASH TO PAY $5.3 MILLION TO SETTLE SAN FRANCISCO CLAIM FOR IC MISCLASSIFICATION. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
’ Hirabayashi v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
” Citing Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
” Citing Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Gold rushers would from there travel by river, land, and two lakes to the Pacific Ocean, and then onward to San Francisco. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Respect Life South San Francisco v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
