Search for: "United Service Protection Corp. v. Lowe" Results 1 - 20 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm by Keith Rizzardi
This is a legitimate goal and the closure of the S-12A gate directly furthered the Corps' goal of protecting the sparrow by keeping water levels low in the relevant area during that period. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:50 am by Amy Howe
At Reason.com, Damon Root looks at the issues in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
The standard for confusion is rather low, as eloquently explained by Justice Foster in Morningstar Corp Society v Express Newspaper [1979] FSR. 113: “if a moron in a hurry would be misled. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:43 pm
On Monday, November 27, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
 Original works of authorship The Review Board set out that its decision was based on the “low standard of copyrightability” set out in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., (499 U.S. 340 (1991), requiring a “minimal creative spark”). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
§§ 256b, 1396r-8(a)(1), (5).[2] Such healthcare providers typically serve low-income and rural populations. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Army Corps of Engineers published a final rule 1 to revise the definition of waters of the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am by Andrew Spillane
 Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The EFF also highlights a “vigilante” provision which sets the bar extremely low for service providers to block sites in the absence of judicial oversight, something which is evidently open to abuse. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]