Search for: "United Source One, Inc. v. US Department of Agriculture"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In one such suit, Bella Vista LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Discharge of pollutants from one-point source into a navigable water of the United States requires a NPDES permit under the CWA. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
I had to stop every half hour to use the bathroom. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:47 am
True Organic Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
These sources are discussed below. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Sandra Shines v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:01 am
Given this, the Colorado Department of Agriculture has long said that Eagle 20 is fine to use on most vegetation grown in the state, assuming it is within acceptable limits, but cannot be used on tobacco products that could be heated or inhaled. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
<> AGRICULTURE, WATER - Final Rule. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Google Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
