Search for: "United State v. Barker"
Results 61 - 80
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
Applying due process principles under Montana state law as well as United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm
Batoff of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel on their HR Legalist Disney’s Influence on United States Copyright Law – Sacramento lawyer Josh H. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
State v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit’s Pro-PAGA Decision Is Not the Death Knell for Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
1 Oct 2015, 7:34 pm
The decision appears contrary to the United States Supreme Court holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Patent No. 8,177,449• Count V for Patent Infringement: Inducement To Infringe U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
Fellow Kat Darren, together with his EIP colleague Robert Barker, write up the Idenix v Gilead litigation over whether a document cited as prior art in a patent validity dispute over novelty is entitled to its priority date, on the jiplp weblog here. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
"The Los Angeles Review of Books reviews Clark Stoeckley's The United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
In the case coming to the Supreme Court, Young v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
Ball State University, 133 S. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm
In United States v.Velazquez, No 12-3992 (3d. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:45 am
See Barker, 407 U.S. at 531; Cantu v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
There is a long history of this association in the Commonwealth and the United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:22 am
Normally, Justice Sotomayor notes, the Court would not grant cert. to resolve simply a mistaken application, or even an erroneous fact-bound determination, of the four Barker v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
