Search for: "United State v. Barker"
Results 121 - 140
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 7:42 am
Div. 1977) (quoting Barker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Soto and United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
In Jones, the Seventh Circuit - following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. $8,850 - applied the speedy trial test from Barker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:23 pm
United States, 486 U.S. 153, 159 [ ] (1988)… ; see generally United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
After the case (Barker v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
On FRE’s part, the licence stated “we warrant for our part that the Housing Unit complies with all current legislation and is fully licensed as required to be used as residential property. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:45 pm
Barker Olmsted & Barnier, APLC [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:48 am
AUTO - GRAVES AMENDMENT - LEASED TRAILERZawatsky v Barker Materials, Ltd. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court ordinarily rejects criminal cases for review absent a material split of opinions in the state appellate courts, federal appellate courts, or both, unless the Court finds a compelling Constitutional question to justify review nonetheless. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Also from the VC, see Supreme Court to Hear Potentially Important Property Rights Case, about SCOTUS agreeing to review the following question: In determining whether the Due Process Clause requires a State or local government to provide a post-seizure probable cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should district courts apply the "speedy trial" test employed in United States… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 900 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1990)* King v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
On appeal, the Vermont Supreme Court applied the four-part test set out in Barker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
A state litigant seeking review of a state court judgment must follow the appellate process through the state court system and then directly to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
