Search for: "United States' Response Brief Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction"
Results 1 - 20
of 628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2018, 1:20 pm
The full document is available below: The UNITED STATES' RESPONSE BRIEF REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (PDF) The UNITED STATES' RESPONSE BRIEF REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (Text) [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
But even if we were to assume for the sake of argument that historically the ATS was exclusively intended only to authorize jurisdiction where the United States as a whole could be held responsible for the tort in violation of the law of nations, the extent to which that intent necessarily controls modern-day ATS jurisdiction is, to my mind anyway, far from clear. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:13 am
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Federal courts, however, are courts of limited subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
It provides that the “district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
For the purposes of this Article, an offence shall be considered an extraditable offence: (a) regardless of whether the laws in the requesting and requested States place the offence within the same category of offences or describe the offence by the same terminology; (b) regardless of whether the offence is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:58 pm
Jurisdiction ratione loci to rul [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:49 am
As discussed further below, even under the narrower, vertical interpretation of “ensure respect” the United States may have obligations regarding Israel-Palestine. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:17 pm
The parties will then have until March 20, 2019 to file responsive briefs. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
Both briefs argue first that military-commission jurisdiction is and should be strictly limited. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
This provision was included in the Treaty at the instance of the U.S. delegation in response to concerns over due process before special terrorism tribunals in Peru. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
Response #1: Original Meaning, Not Original Intentions As a matter of original public meaning, the presidency is either an "office . . . under the United States" or it is not. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
In that regard, I note that Hong Kong is entering into the Agreement with the authorization of ‘‘the sovereign government which is responsible for its foreign affairs. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am
This article also permits the Government of the United States to request the extradition of a person for any extraditable offense when Federal jurisdiction is based upon the use of the mails or other means of carrying out interstate commerce. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
Here, at the eleventh hour, after briefing and oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:57 am
The United States would be unable to protest, given the actions of its own ITC." [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
(Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Federal-Aid Highway Act; Grable Exception) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2023.html Shaevitz v. [read post]
Yawn: amicus briefs in support of Google's API copyright petition to the Supreme Court have surfaced
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
