Search for: "United States, Etc. v. Medical Center, Etc." Results 1 - 20 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 7:32 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
We will accept conference papers of all lengths and styles (e.g., law review, medical, philosophy, or policy journal, etc.), but chapters in conference volumes are generally limited to about 5,000 words. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
Again there appears to be a tension between the full resort to technologies of aligning sex, gender, identity, etc., to the physical bodies in which these may be realized, and the development of notions of intent (good, bad, false, etc.) as a limiting principle. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The County, and the United States in general are protected by what is known as ‘herd immunity’ as the result of the generally high rate of vaccinations for measles in the population. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 Moreover, our main focus is on the setting of the United States, although we remain interested in comparative approaches and ways in which a lack of international harmonization may cause problems. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As you may be aware, the VWP allows citizens or nationals of certain participating countries the ability to travel to the United States for a temporary period of 90 days or less without having to obtain a United States visa. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
The law expressly allows medical marijuana dispensaries to exist; an outright ban on dispensaries  by local governments conflicts with State law and is therefore not possible. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
The concealed carry ban in the new state of Kentucky was soon ruled unconstitutional in Bliss v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am by Kevin
  Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]