Search for: "United States, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant-appellant"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
The court found that Egilman had manipulated data to reach misleading conclusions, devoid of scientific validity.[5] Egilman was so distraught by being excluded that he sought to file a personal appeal to the United States Court of Appeal.[6] When the defendant-appellee opposed Egilman’s motion to intervene in the plaintiff’s appeal, Egilman stridently asserted his right to participate,[7] and filed his own declaration.[8] The declaration is… [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Genuine Issue of Material FactThe four elements of a breach of contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid contract; (2) performance, or tendered performance, by the plaintiff; (3) breach of the contract by the defendant; and (4) damages to the plaintiff resulting from that breach. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 3:25 pm
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Wright, Thompson Hine LLP, Cleveland, for Appellant Ford Motor Company Robert W. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Ford Motor Company Western District of Kentucky at LouisvilleMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Ford Motor Co. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Defendant-Appellant the Government of the Russian Federation ("Russia") appeals from the district court's order absolving Plaintiff-Appellee the United States of America ("United States") of all potential liability with respect to certain isotopes. [read post]
