Search for: "United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Massachusetts"
Results 61 - 80
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Brozman, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Muchmore; JD 2003 Yale University; Bigelow Fellow University of Chicago; United States Court of Appeals, United States District Court; Food and Drug Law, International Business Transactions Pepperdine University Greg McNeal; JD ? [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Catron 15-690Issue: Whether a district court may dismiss a removed action rather than remanding it to state court under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts Walker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts Walker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 6:37 pm
Other supporting agencies include the North Attleboro Police, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Massachusetts State Police Special Services Operations, the Rhode Island State Police, the State Police Unit assigned to the Plymouth County District Attorneys Office and the Rhode Island HIDTA Group, (a multi-jurisdictional task force comprised of various Rhode Island Law Enforcement Agencies.) [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:20 pm
The issue came before the New Hampshire Supreme Court in the form of a certified question from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, in connection with a case pending in that court. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
§ 33.4 and FAA Order 8110.54 must be considered and enforced in a federal district court and/or a United States Circuit Court of Appeals in providing the appropriate standard of care for state law remedies involving claims of misappropriation of aviation overhaul/repair and maintenance information alleged to be trade secrets; (2) whether an FAA authorized aviation maintenance provider can be, in effect, required to violate… [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:31 am
Massachusetts, which challenged Massachusetts law that required specific minimum mental-health care benefits to be provided under general insurance policies and employee healthcare plans, and Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts 2014). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
Cox Loses In The Trial Court, Which Gets It Wrong Padrick sued in United States District Court in Oregon. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
European Community, in which the Court is considering whether and to what extent RICO applies outside the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Asarco LLC, that the Bankruptcy Code does not permit a Bankruptcy Court to award attorney’s fees for work performed defending a fee application. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:20 pm
With regard to Good Harbor, the company commenced proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts on June 1, 2004... [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Arkison 12-1200Issue: (1) Whether Article III permits the exercise of the judicial power of the United States by bankruptcy courts on the basis of litigant consent, and, if so, whether "implied consent" based on a litigant’s conduct, where the statutory scheme provides the litigant no notice that its consent is required, is sufficient to satisfy Article III; and (2) whether a bankruptcy judge may submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of… [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:55 am
District Court for the Western District of Washington on behalf of Terrice Aikens.Aikens, a 48-year-old resident of the State of Washington, received her uterine cancer diagnosis on July 15, 2021. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:58 pm
District Court. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The Eastern District of Pennsylvania finds that the automatic stay in bankruptcy does not apply to injunctive enforcement of a noncompete: In re Stone Resources. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
