Search for: "United States Central District of California" Results 61 - 80 of 2,374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm by Unknown
(Writ of Habeas Corpus; Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Courts) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Cambridge Central School District v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Michael Douglas
’ Second, it included an exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause (cl 15B(i)): ‘Claims for Injury, Illness or Death: All claims or disputes involving Emotional Harm, bodily injury, illness to or death of any Guest whatsoever, including without limitation those arising out of or relating to this Passage Contract or Your Cruise, shall be litigated in and before the United States District Courts for the Central District of California in Los… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm by Ortiz Law Firm
Sutton then filed this case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:32 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Lawsuit On November 9, 2023, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Central District of California. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 3:41 pm by Banks Law Office
District Court for the Eastern District of California, comprises charges against Sumchai for violating antifraud provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
In light of Trader Joe’s previous failed attempts to force the platform’s creators to cease use of “Trader Joe”, Trader Joe’s brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Central California against both the creators and Trader Joe asserting causes of action for federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, violations of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act,… [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
In light of Trader Joe’s previous failed attempts to force the platform’s creators to cease use of “Trader Joe”, Trader Joe’s brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Central California against both the creators and Trader Joe asserting causes of action for federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, violations of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act,… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 am by Stuart Tubis
Equal Access Group are filed in United States District Court, Central District of California. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:00 am by Zak Gowen
Mastercard Tells Congress Credit Card Competition Act Is Bad for Consumers, BusinessesPYMNTS – September 22, 2023 Mastercard has written a letter to several members of the United States Congress, outlining its opposition to the Credit Card Competition Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Dan Harris
The United States District Court for the Central District of California held that the PRC judgment was final, conclusive, and enforceable under PRC laws and the plaintiffs were therefore entitled to an issuance of a domestic judgment in the amount of the PRC judgment. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:55 am by Seán Binder
Central Command said in a statement. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
As lawsuits proceeded in other jurisdictions seeking to block DACA’s termination, Republican state elected officials returned to Hanen seeking essentially the opposite relief: a ruling declaring that DACA is unlawful and an injunction requiring the initiative to be immediately terminated. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 3:24 am by Seán Binder
The move reflects steps the Economic Community of Central African States and the African Union took. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:57 am by Seán Binder
The Solomon Islands’ growing relationship with China has concerned the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Haofei Liu
District Judge Beth Labson Freeman granted a preliminary injunction, writing in her opinion that “the State has no right to enforce obligations that would essentially press private companies into service as government censors. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
Specifically, Applicant explains by way of background that to resolve a prior trademark infringement action between the parties in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 8:18-cv-02194 (JVS-KES), the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement, which explicitly states that so long as Applicant abandoned its earlier-filed trademark application Serial No. 87912445, Opposer would not oppose… [read post]