Search for: "United States Express Co. v. Minnesota"
Results 141 - 160
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 2:56 am
Phillips v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Riyad; Eureka Water Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
Concerns have been expressed that such a plan would cost the United States control over both its budget and its environmental policy. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
Concerns have been expressed that such a plan would cost the United States control over both its budget and its environmental policy. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:07 am
Monsanto Co., 132 F.3d 442, 445 (8th Cir. 1998) (employee did not engage in protected activity when he copied confidential documents to support his discrimination claim); Comiskey v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
In addition to these class actions, the Minnesota Attorney General filed State of Minnesota v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:04 am
Gypsum Co. v. 3M Innovative Props. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:13 am
In this case, the District of Minnesota found the decisional unit of all United States-based employees to be too broad. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
Rind and his co-authors have been systematically ostracized and excluded from many scholarly journals. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:49 am
Johnson & Johnson Co., et al., C.A. [read post]
