Search for: "United States Of America v. Certain real property" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
While certain E2E-V online voting systems have been created by academics, decades of research concludes that no E2E-V online voting system is robust enough to be deployed widely. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
Cheeroke Nation Distributors (age discrimination)Rincon Mushroom Corporation of America v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The statute set up certain procedures and certain tribunals through which the federal government has to go in order to be allowed to monitor and intercept electronic communications involving persons outside the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1776, when the United States of America was founded, the legal institution of slavery existed in every state in the union. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dreyfuss: in South America, TM/the maker is the key to generics. [read post]
In Booking.com, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) refused to register the mark “BOOKING.COM,” finding it generic. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The initial term of the agreement was for four months ‘‘or until the buyer’s contingencies are either satisfied or waived with respect to the purchase of the property, whichever comes first. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor)   Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In the latter case, there is no question that there is a taking when the government locates a public highway on property, so why should there be a question when the government decides to flood certain property? [read post]