Search for: "United States Response to the Court's November 20, 2013 Order" Results 1 - 20 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United States opinion in the United States Court of Claims, a wilful FBAR Penalty case. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by Joel R. Brandes
 On November 18, 2013, Father, Mother, and the daughters traveled from El Salvador to Maryland with a scheduled return date of January 25, 2014. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:17 am by Florian Mueller
One unknown here is whether Judge Koh, with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, would have worded her criteria for a renewed motion for a stay differently if she had anticipated the current situation. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am by Chris Wesner
: Judge Preston MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENYING UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. #20) This cause came on for consideration of William Sijan’s (the “Debtor”) Motion for Summary Judgment Denying United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #20) (the “Motion for Summary Judgment”), … [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:32 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Congress.gov also incorporates some content which was not easily accessible on THOMAS, such as a prominent space for the Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (CONAN), an annotated version of the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:44 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
A recent decision entered by the United States District Court, M.D. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:39 am by Ken White
Sure, Nazaire is trying to make a point that the decisions of a United States District Judge in one state do not dictate the decisions of a United States District Judge in another state. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner and Respondent lived together in Japan from September 2013 through May 2018; thereafter, Respondent returned to the United States. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Julio J., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner was a Canadian citizen, while Respondent and R were United States citizens. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible commentators on topics of interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:38 pm by Daniel Richardson
  The ability of parents to make decisions about the upbringing of their children is a fundamental right that the United States Supreme Court believes is protected under our federal Constitution. [read post]