Search for: "United States Testing Company, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Under the National Labor Relations Act, the National Labor Relations Board issues, prosecutes, and adjudicates complaints alleging that employers committed unfair labor practices. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
At the end of last week, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued two huge blows to employers that give significant advantages to unions and ease their ability to achieve status as a certified bargaining representative. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Companies responding to Staff investigations may also experience accelerated timelines and less flexibility in responding to subpoenas and information requests. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Layne Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Kreisberg 14-93Issue: (1) Whether a companion authorization issued by the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board in conjunction with an order from the board itself, purporting to possess a quorum and take the same action on its own behalf, suffices to authorize a Section 10(j) proceeding commenced while the board itself lacked a quorum to authorize it; and (2) whether the familiar four-factor test for preliminary… [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
http://j.st/pjU United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia October 28, 2011 Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In 1991 they entered the United States on visitor visas and, after they overstayed their visas and the Immigration and Nationalization Service issued orders to show cause why they should not be deported, Arturas applied for asylum. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Petitioner’s reply Title: Board of Trustees o [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis by OSHA chief David Michaels and Deborah Greenfield, acting deputy solicitor of the department. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
Financial Institution Employees (Seattle-First National Bank), 475 U.S. 192 (1986), cast grave uncertainty on that standard. [read post]