Search for: "United States and State of California Federal Corporation" Results 81 - 100 of 3,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2019, 5:50 am
Introduction Similar to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, the passage of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) is ushering in a new era of data privacy and data security considerations in the United States as companies are preparing for its effectiveness, the possibility for follow-ons in other states and the potential for preemptive federal legislation. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am by Dan Harris
On August 12, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a judgment enforcing a $6.5 million dollar Chinese judgment against an American corporate defendant under California’s version of the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act and in 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting judgment on the pleadings to Google, Facebook, EMC Corporation and VMware, Inc. that PersonalWeb Technologies'  patent claims were ineligible under Section 101. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In a federal system, such as the United States, we observe two forms of regulatory competition. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
Eight medical professionals and associates are charged in federal grand jury indictments with buying and selling patients in a bribery scheme involving $25 million in improper claims for medical services and devices which were then billed to California Workers Compensation insurance companies, according to the United States Attorney’s Office (Southern District of California). [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 1:25 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Yet seven states want to try this experiment in the United States? [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pass-through businesses, such as sole proprietorships, S corporations, and partnerships, make up a majority of businesses in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:00 pm by Kantor & Kantor LLP
FILED A COMPLAINT in the United States District Court, Central District of California on behalf of their client Sovereign Health, a Gold Star Award winning healthcare provider that treated mental health, substance abuse, and dual diagnosis patients . [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
He is a United Kingdom citizen and non- immigrant alien, living in the United States pursuant to a valid E-2 Visa, who at all relevant times has been residing in Sonoma, California. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Two Californian citizens filed a suit against Hertz Corporation in a California State Court. [read post]
For manufacturers and companies selling products throughout the United States, California’s new law is a big deal. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:13 am by staff@mortgagefraudblog.com
John Richard Varner, 56, Hesperia, California, the former president of Mortgage One Corporation, was sentenced to 156 months in prison for defrauding the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and private lenders by fraudulently obtaining hundreds of federally insured loans and selling those mortgages to private lenders in a scheme that caused tens of millions of dollars in losses to the federal housing agency. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by Robert Wernli, Jr.
If the issuer has shareholders in states other than California, then the laws of those states must also be analyzed to see if a notice and/or fee is required. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 6:42 am by Scott J. Etish
Chipotle, the plaintiffs’ failure to properly serve an out-of-state corporation via certified mail – where the plaintiffs’ service of process did not utilize the restricted delivery option offered by the United States Postal Service – resulted in the denial of the plaintiffs’ motion to remand and the associated loss of any tactical advantage the plaintiffs may have believed to exist in litigating their class action in state… [read post]