Search for: "United States et al v. Universal Health Services, Inc., et al."
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Striking of pleadings -- Error to enter order striking pleadings as sanction for refusal of plaintiff and her attorney to appear where written order does not make it apparent that court considered all factors set out in Kozel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:47 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 25, 2011 Buffalo Marine Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133, (June 20, 2013). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Natural Organics, Inc. et. al.; McNamara v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
: étude des contrats de service en droit suisse et américain / Anne Meier.Meier, Anne.Genève : Slatkine, 2013.K7298 .M4 2013 Environmental Law Climate change geoengineering : philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks / edited by Wil C.G. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug 29, 2008)(Corrected Opinion by Brister) IN RE MCALLEN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A MCALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district(13-05-00441-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-05-05)real parties in interest's motion for oral argument deniedcorrected opinion issued Forest Oil Corp v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a… [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
State Street Corporation, U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
BIC Corporation et al. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
University of Tex. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
It is grounded in a set of basic premises: that law embedded within the domestic legal orders of states with legitimately established governments is the most authoritative form of regulation,[16] that authentic remedies must be embedded within domestic legal orders of legitimately constituted states,[17]and that law across jurisdictions can be harmonized in part because it reflects universal values, or can be made to be coherent, at least at some reasonable level of… [read post]
