Search for: "United States f/b/o IES Commercial, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
[I]f Ms. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Sandgrund and Scott F. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Oracle America, Inc., No. 18-956. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
In the absence of a better moniker, I have collectively labelled them as Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigants [“OPCA litigants”], to functionally define them collectively for what they literally are. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 6:49 am
O'Reilly. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
I’m tired of copyright being used to monopolize public law. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
By Michael Douglas and Mhairi Stewart Andrew Bell is a leader of private international law in Australia. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
ABC, Inc., 898 F. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Blockbuster, Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Universal Pictures Corporation, 45 F.2d 119 (2nd Cir. 1930), per Learned Hand J. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
Dick and Sam O. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
No. 30-2009-003090696)O P I N I O NOriginal proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order ofthe Superior Court of Orange County, David C. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
Rather, consistent with the Board's eligibility standard for laid-off employees, I would assess whether the employee, as of the date of the election, has a reasonable expectancy of returning to the unit. [read post]
