Search for: "United States of America v. Funds in the amount of "
Results 61 - 80
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:44 am
One of the candidates for "Antitrust Trial of the Year 2023" is the upcoming United States et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
” Before the BCRA was enacted, these soft-money contributions to political campaigns — used to fund issue ads, purely state and local campaigns, and get-out-the-vote activities in years when state/local and federal candidates were on the ballot — were unrestricted. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Undeterred by the loss in court, Trump’s USAGM leadership demanded repeatedly that the OTF provide large amounts of highly detailed information under its obligations as a grantee. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
An initial subsidy is paid out of state funds, and the candidates are initially limited to spending only that amount. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:11 am
Hsu opened a Bank of America account while working in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
Across America, an intense debate is taking place over how states should structure their labor relations, and especially the extent to which state and local government employees should have the right to elect unions to represent them in collective bargaining. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:43 am
All women will be affected by these developments.Outside of the United States, the attack on women’s health care is even more devastating. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
On December 18, 1951, the employees’ representative, United Steelworkers of America, C. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Environmental Defense Fund listing of facts with links to sources. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:54 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
