Search for: "United States of America v. In the Matter of Tax Liabilities of: John Does"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
It matters. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
With renewed interest in greater R&D spending at the federal level and increasing international competition for innovative activity, it is important to get the tax treatment of R&D right to avoid undermining America’s innovative edge. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
JOHN G. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
And does it even matter. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
John Elwood provides useless blather to accompany Monday’s relists. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
It ensures harmonious operation of state product liability law with the "unique system used to distribute prescription [products]. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The focus is on CSR (1) as a subject of legal regulation within states, (2) as a matter of international law and compliance beyond the state, and (3) as a tool and methodology for privatizing regulation through the enterprise itself operating in global production chains. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Sovereign states, along with their agencies and instrumentalities, are as a general matter immune from suit in the United States under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
If the MSA does not require congressional consent, no state compact can violate the Compact Clause unless it is already unlawful for some other, independent reason.The MSAThe MSA has its origin in state-initiated liability lawsuits, ostensibly to recoup state expenses for smoking-related illnesses. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
The case is Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
” Representative Matters Representative Appellate Matters Microsoft v. [read post]
