Search for: "United States of America v. O" Results 81 - 100 of 1,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
O'Donnell has responded that he would be willing to plead to a misdemeanor and pay a large fine, however, representatives of the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of California have stated that they would require O'Donnell to plead guilty to a felony. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am by Anton Metlitsky
 He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Lucy F Reed & James Freda, Maxwell Lecture: After ICCA Singapore, After ICCA Miami: The Next QuestionsCase CommentsCharles T Kotuby, Jr & James Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: Will Barriers to Jurisdiction Inhibit an Emerging Trend? [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:15 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the New York Times, Jeffrey Rosen discusses United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992) Justice O’Connor wrote the 6-3 majority opinion in a case about the respective roles of the federal government and the states under the 10th Amendment. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a unanimous panel decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by Adam Chandler
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
This is a well-financed, well-organized war that I first saw in action when I clerked for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor during the 1989 Term and when I won the 1997 Boerne v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Read the prior posting: CMS Has 6 Year Statute of Limitations-Court Dismisses MSP Recovery Claim 10.1.2010United States of America v James J. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The court has already decided its one other patent-focused case for the term–United States v. [read post]