Search for: "United States of America v. Phillips" Results 101 - 120 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
All across the United States, people are going to the polls today to vote in this year’s midterm elections. 19.3 million early votes have already been logged in the most expensive midterm election ever. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 11:16 am
Instead, according to Translogic, Gorai teaches logic circuits with input terminals coupled to share signals and receive constants.In Phillips v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Together we represent thousands of organizations that employ millions of workers in the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
It is undisputed that Honeywell performed this work in the United States prior to Solvay's priority date of October 23, 1995. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]