Search for: "United States of America v. Pierce" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Larry
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
District Court Judge who has the case began her opinion by noting that [d]uring a trial that lasted approximately one week, the United States presented evidence that [Shahulhameed] was terminated from his position at Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America -- where he worked as a subcontractor -- on August 23, 2012. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
The case was the subject of a 1992 book, Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am by Andrew Hamm
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:23 am by Maxwell Kennerly
DeViedma served as the primary contact between Devon and HRSRL. * * * In December 2008, Devon Robotics began negotiating a contract with McKesson Corporation, another defendant, which would give McKesson the right to distribute CytoCare within a certain territory in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 8:53 am by Randy Barnett
Kavanaugh is here referring favorably to the 1925 Due Process case of Pierce v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. 2d at 35-36 (holding state could not force Amish child to remain in formal high school until age sixteen); Pierce v. [read post]