Search for: "United States of America v. Real Property" Results 81 - 100 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 99) (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
Microsoft (271 Patent Blog) (IP Osgoode) (PatLit) (IAM) (IP finance) (Intellectual Property and Tech Law Reports) CAFC: Rejected claim construction does not render case ‘objectively baseless’: iLOR v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
If the high court takes this case, an interesting question is posed: Can participating in a fantasy baseball league require Unites States Supreme Court judges to recuse themselves? [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
Jason Getsy (and remember, it's not too late to write Governor Strickland and urge him to commute Getsy's death sentence) or United States of America v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that there is a real possibility of a successful secession movement in the United States and explains how it might happen. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm by John Floyd
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down   In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
 However, In their 2016 article, Hemel & Ouellette explain that the opposite rule would be the one more likely to “lower prices of patented goods in the United States and raise prices abroad. [read post]