Search for: "United States of America v. Roberts" Results 181 - 200 of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute inter partes review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
With great clarity and insight, he offers a new lens through which to understand the history of civil rights in the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
", Dennis Crouch says that this view has been advanced by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in its recent proposed guidelines. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:59 am by Kevin Johnson
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Rachel Kovner seemed to make somewhat inconsistent arguments. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:31 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
 Those sources ranged from Jean Jacques Rousseau’s An Inquiry Into the Nature of the Social Contract (1791) to James Wilson’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States of America (1792) to precise page citations to Robert Post’s forthcoming book Citizens Divided: Campaign Financed Reform and the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]