Search for: "United States v. 11 CASES, ETC."
Results 81 - 100
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
The federal law says that aliens not lawfully present in the United States can't get in-state tuition on the basis of residence within a state. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm
This form/substance distinction keeps showing up in Supreme Court antitrust cases (American Needle, NC Dental, etc.). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Contrary to the position in Case 132/78 Denkavit [1979] 3 CMLR 605 and Cases C-441/98 etc Kapniki Mikhailidis [2001] 1 CMLR 13, on which the Court of Appeal relied, “the present scheme identifies, according to objective criteria, the time when sea fish or sea fish products can be said to enter the United Kingdom market on a commercial basis, following upon their production or importation and firsthand sale (in whichever order these events occur). [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Yonkers, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
(Eugene Volokh) As I had expected, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Stolen Valor Act case (United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Case 1:19-cv-21725-JLK Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2019 Page 10 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISIONCASE NO.: 19-cv-21725-KINGJAVIER GARCIA-BENGOCHEA,Plaintiff,v.CARNIVAL CORPORATION d/b/a/ CARNIVALCRUISE LINE, a foreign corporation,Defendant. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Peruta was decided along with a similar case, Richards v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2004, 12:35 pm
Dec. 17, 1997); United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Jan. 15, 2015).IssueThe question before this court is whether a California state court malpractice case involving patent law representation was properly removed to a federal court.Neurorepair, Inc., at *2.HoldingBased on Gunn v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:40 am
"
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am
California, etc.), the United States was far and away the source of the most law enforcement requests to Google for information and, even more interesting, far and away had the smallest proportion of requests denied. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
As stated above, this mindset is both helpful and harmful. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
BANCO NACIONAL DE CRÉDITO, C.A., etc., Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Sanctions -- Due process -- State v. [read post]
