Search for: "United States v. 20 CASES, ETC." Results 41 - 60 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm by Florian Mueller
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WIMS
Supreme Court Greenhouse Gas Case? [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
  Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
  Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:25 pm by Matthew David Brozik
I can’t write a better introductory sentence than Judge Andrew Carter of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York did to open his May 20, 2013, order and opinion in Blagman v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
As previous case law had shown, if a s.20 duty has arisen and the Council has provided accommodation, it cannot side step the duty by claiming to have acted under some other power [R(H) v Wandsworth BC [2007] EWHC 1082 (Admin); R(D) v Southwark LBC [2007] EWCA Civ 182; etc.]. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
The United Kingdom currently permits whole life sentences but after the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Vinter v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a  motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]