Search for: "United States v. 30 CASES, ETC." Results 21 - 40 of 561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
The court also noted that the case respects the underlying rationale behind the presumption against extraterritoriality: since the defendant is a U.S. company and the United States is on record opposing the use of torture in any context, the case does not present any of the potential foreign relations problems associated with suing foreign nationals in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:03 pm
Gruninger, 30 M.J. 1142, 1143 (A.F.C.M.R. 1990); United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
Supreme Court, but then the justices agreed in March to hear an admiralty law case over choice-of-law provisions in which he represents a yacht owner challenging the denial of an insurance claim.Today's DJ has:Floyd Siegal's A Ruthless Court, about the friendship between RBG and Nino Scalia.PJ Gilbert has Times, They Changed, about judges who write books (e.g., Beds, Eileen Moore, Anthony Mohr, Timothy Fall, etc.) and how judges reveal more about themselves than ever… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am by Maya Angenot
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), the historic case where the United States Supreme Court held that separate educational facilities for black and white students violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The County, and the United States in general are protected by what is known as ‘herd immunity’ as the result of the generally high rate of vaccinations for measles in the population. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
The issue of post-trial delay and prejudice is on the front burner again as a result of CAAF's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
Review of the opinion of Judge Cowen, of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, in the case of Alexander McLeod / by a citizen of New York. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Contrary to the position in Case 132/78 Denkavit [1979] 3 CMLR 605 and Cases C-441/98 etc Kapniki Mikhailidis [2001] 1 CMLR 13, on which the Court of Appeal relied, “the present scheme identifies, according to objective criteria, the time when sea fish or sea fish products can be said to enter the United Kingdom market on a commercial basis, following upon their production or importation and firsthand sale (in whichever order these events occur). [read post]