Search for: "United States v. 30 CASES, ETC."
Results 101 - 120
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
FULLER, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm
Homeland SecurityThe investigation and arrest of Prokopi is an outgrowth of the civil forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
” The Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States is here tonight. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am
The validity of that Deed will depend upon the language contained therein as well as technical issues, like signing, witnessing, notarization, etc. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
Later cases raised the issue of whether it trumps the border search exception, which would mean officers would have to get a search warrant to open and read mail traveling into or out of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Not sure you can get a map of equivalent changes v. each district court/court of appeals cases in the US. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
It's unclear how much business defendants conducted in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice, service of process,… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
The dispute over most of these items is whether the particular unit of property—i.e., window, door, flooring, trim, etc. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
These together define a means of declaring law that remains influential in the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
” See US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Nov. 18, 2021). [10] A recent study indicates that 30 percent of anti-activist pills in the United States already have a provision requiring shareholder approval. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The German and and Swiss Synthes entities have no presence in "the United States or the State of Texas. [read post]
