Search for: "United States v. AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, ETC."
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
" Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
" Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
Must Article 5(1) and Article 8(1) of ... [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
United States). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
” Now, as to why robo-signing only seems to be a serious prosecutable crime in the State of Nevada? [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
(Eugene Volokh) As I had expected, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Stolen Valor Act case (United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:04 am
“Bush v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
United States — which was heavily relied on by the Ninth Circuit decision invalidating the Stolen Valor Act — stated that speech is fully protected (though that protection might be overcome under strict scrutiny) unless it fits within historically established First Amendment exceptions. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
The term fair use originated in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:05 pm
The United States’ military has continually been at war for more than nine years. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
But the Ninth Circuit holds otherwise, and reverses the grant of summary judgment to the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
I saw your web site and articles you wrote to your blog. [read post]
