Search for: "United States v. ARTICLE OF DRUG, ETC." Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Offenses covered by Article 4(2)(b) of the Treaty include: –aircraft hijacking covered by The Hague Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, done at The Hague December 16, 1970, and entered into force October 14, 1971; –aircraft sabotage covered by the Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation, done at Montreal September 23, 1971, and entered into force January 26, 1973; and, –narcotics trafficking… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:23 pm
A Supreme Court ruling for Wyeth in Levine v Wyeth would nationalize the Michigan disaster and prevent all United States citizens from pursuing big pharmacuetical companies for the devastating consequences of bad drugs. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:30 pm by Michael Lowe
Instead, the ADA must look to charging for drug charges involving manufacturing or distribution of the drug (be it fentanyl, heroin, meth, etc.). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Ryan Chirnomas, Partner in the Biotechnology group at Westerman, Hattori, Daniels and Adrian, sent in this article discussing Friday’s Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision in the AMP v. [read post]