Search for: "United States v. ARTICLE OR DEVICE, ETC." Results 1 - 20 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 8:59 am by Florian Mueller
Not the telematics control unit (TCU), network access device (NAD), or baseband chipset.The EC's proposal for how to tackle the problem of unwilling licensees in the automotive sector is similarly results-focused as the rationale behind the Continental v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am by Larry
United States has an interesting history. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by The Legal Blog
As we said, the object of granting the concessional rate of duty was to protect the smaller units in the industry from the competition by the larger ones and that object would have been frustrated, if, by adopting the device of fragmentation, the larger units could become the ultimate beneficiaries of the bounty. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Interestingly, the United States appears to be attempting to restrict large-scale arbitration just at a time when other jurisdictions have begun to embrace it. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
’The 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 18(a) of the Missouri Constitution guarantee a defendant the right `to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation. . . . [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:43 pm by Donald Thompson
 But different strokes for different folks – some prefer other types of mobile devices. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am by Florian Mueller
Grewal used to serve as a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California. [read post]