Search for: "United States v. ASSOCIATED MERCHANDISING CORPORATION"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:01 am
August 16, 2016 - 2 PM: Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
August 16, 2016 - 2 PM: Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association to sell or offer for sale in this state any merchandise on which merchandise or on its container there appears the words “Made in U.S.A. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
HNI Corporation and Allsteel Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Preemption: California law provides: It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association to sell or offer for sale in this State any merchandise on which merchandise or on its container there appears the words ‘Made in the U.S.A. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
The retail industry in the United States has yet to solve its growing problem of “retail shrink,” which is defined as “the difference between the amount of merchandise (or inventory) that the retail company owns on its books, and the results of a physical count of the merchandise. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
To the extent that cumulative trade actions against foreign merchandise can be interpreted as a trade policy, it is in the United States a trade policy by default. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Calling the motion "wholly without merit, both factually and legally," the judge, Denny Chin of United States District Court threw out the case. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
In a huge win for consumers in New Jersey and throughout the United States, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided today in the case of Real v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:15 am
One such case is XYZ Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:39 am
"
DEB Associates v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
In its decision released yesterday in Cinar Corporation v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Bearby, The National Collegiate Athletic Association (United States) Temporary restrictions on signs, samples, structures. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
," or similar words when the merchandise or any article, unit, or part thereof, has been entirely or substantially made, manufactured, or produced outside of the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
To the extent that cumulative trade actions against foreign merchandise can be interpreted as a trade policy, it is in the United States a trade policy by default. [read post]
