Search for: "United States v. Abdo" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
  Jurecic sat down with Rozenshtein and Alex Abdo to discuss the recent ruling by the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:45 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy has this post, which also links to the debate: I argued that accessing those records is not a “search” of the cell-phone users, while Alex Abdo (formerly of the ACLU, now of the Knight... [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:27 am by Orin Kerr
United States, the pending Fourth Amendment case on government access to historical cell-site records. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Scott Bomboy
The Knight Institute is representing filed seven plaintiffs in the United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York. [read post]
“Apple believes deeply that people in the United States and around the world deserve data protection, security and privacy,” Apple said. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Commenters on a recent thread raised some excellent questions: [LawyerHouston:] If a man from a country which allows him multiple wives moves with his wives to the United States, what is his status vis-a-vis his wives in the United States? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by Dave Maass
"Dragnet surveillance is and has always has been illegal in the United States," says ACLU Staff Attorney Alex Abdo. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm by Matt Danzer
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]