Search for: "United States v. Abrahams" Results 1 - 20 of 365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Though different in their details, these cases elucidate this issue from different perspectives:In January 2024, Rolex was successful in a US trade mark infringement case against BeckerTime before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In 1868, three years after the conclusion of the Civil War and the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the 14th Amendment was ratified and became part of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
In the months before Abraham Lincoln's inauguration in 1861, anti-Lincoln men in Washington plotted to undermine the Union and derail the peaceful transfer of power. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm by Steven Calabresi
United States, so it is hard to be wildly enthusiastic about any of them. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
CPLR § 2106 also provides: ”(b) The statement of any person, when that person is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in lieu of and with the same force and… [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
United States, 3 U.S. 171, Abraham Lincoln, and Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
” John Bingham during the trial of the persons who conspired to murder Abraham Lincoln and during the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson referred to the president as an “executive officer of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
From Gladstone to Thatcher: The Shortage of Parliamentary Time in the United Kingdom and the Implications for Tax Legislation – and BeyondJohn H N Pearce (Formerly HMRC; Associate of the Institute of Taxation, UK)5. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]