Search for: "United States v. Acquisition of Condemned Land"
Results 1 - 20
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), and the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
V. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
United States, 99 Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
But then there is dicta in US v Chicago, 48 US 185 (1849), opinion that "land within a State purchased by the United States as a mere proprietor, and not reserved or appropriated for any special purpose, may be liable to condemnation for streets or highways, like the land of other proprietors, under the rights of eminent domain. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The gap between acquisition of property and when the owner actually receives compensation can be months, even years. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, CRV Enterprises v United States No 10-1151 // [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:56 am
An eminent decision out of the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals is not a common occurrence. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Thus, since 49 WB would be constructing 6 to 8 units of affordable housing, and Ginsberg would be required to provide 85 units, if the 16 units were subtracted from Ginsburg's requirement, the condemnation would actually provide less affordable housing units than if the condemnation did not occur. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
California State Lands Commission (Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Real Party in Interest) (2018) ____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
Here's another one from the vault -- Sturges v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
(United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
The building owner and the tenants must divide up the condemnation award by contract.In City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]
