Search for: "United States v. Adam Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Section 1498(a) further provides that whenever a patented invention "is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof . . . the owner's remedy shall be by action against the United States in the [CFC] for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use or manufacture. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
United States Attorney General Eric Holder has announced policy changes in the wake of the landmark Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Facts: This case (Woods v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
Mother was a citizen of Canada; Father was a citizen of the United States who had status to live and work in Canada because Mother sponsored his application for a visa. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:29 am
In a recent decision, Oxford University Bank v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
United States, 528 U.S. 49, 120 S.Ct. 474 (1999). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
United States - concerning the Armed Career Criminal Act and state convictions for batteryBloate v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:37 am
Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this article on City of Ontario v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:55 pm
United States, and Perry v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
The other appeal, Holder v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
