Search for: "United States v. Ahmed" Results 41 - 60 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
United States rejects the need for heightened scrutiny. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
The rear room, although described as the kitchen, contained no units or sink. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
The rear room, although described as the kitchen, contained no units or sink. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 4:30 am
Appeals court throws out 1 Ressam felony conviction, Seattle Times, Jan. 17, 2007.Ressam is represented by federal public defender Tom Hillier (also a Trial Ad instructor).The case is here: United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 1:55 pm
[This case summarized by Ahmed Soliman, legal intern, Federal & Community Defender for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.]In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:48 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco must still approve the settlement in the lawsuit, known as Ahmed v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:03 pm
Ahmed Ressam tried to enter the United States through Canada and lied about his identity and the contents of his vehicle. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:22 am by Wells Bennett
 The majority opinion opens: TATEL, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Ahmed Belbacha, Abu Dhiab, and Shaker Aamer are detainees who, although cleared for release, remain held at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The appellant’s brief in the case al-Zahrani et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
But noncitizens like Hamdan don't have the sort of "substantial connection with our country" that justifies invoking the constitutional right to habeas corpus, the Supreme Court ruled in 1990, in United States v. [read post]