Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 361 - 380 of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 07-35506 addressed alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”). [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 7:09 am by Pierce Azuma
  Plaintiff was an officer aboard the car ferry M/V COLUMBIA, owned by the State of Alaska. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
United States (sentencing, plain error doctrine) Boyle v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
P. 26(f) (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah) District of Vermont Rule 26. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:23 pm
Burke, United States Senate Election, Expulsion, and Censure Cases, 1793-1990 421-425 (Washington, D.C.: G.P.O., 1995). [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:19 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Hawks: Why Federal Courts Have the Power to Recognize and Enforce Tribal Court Judgments Against Nonmembers “Because of the Federal Government’s Unique Relationship with Indian Tribes” – Heath Albert   PDF The Disproportionate Effect on Native American Women of Extending the Federal Involuntary Manslaughter Act to Include a Woman’s Conduct Against Her Child in Utero: United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:49 pm
United States Supreme Court Sets 1:1 Ratio for Punitive Damage Awards under Federal Maritime Law and Reduces $2.5 Billion Award in Exxon Valdez Class Action to $500 Million, Ending 20-year Class Action Fight The United States Supreme Court issued a stunning ruling yesterday, holding that a punitive damage to compensatory damage ratio of 1:1 is a "fair upper limit" in federal maritime cases. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm by Joe Koncelik
The 13 states covered under the Court’s injunction are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:03 am
Times, Oct. 18, 2007, (last visited October 22, 2007).[4] Id.[5] Id.[6] United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Digging deeper to protect tribal property interests: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:41 pm
(The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Peterson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was filed in one case on 6/19/20:United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 3:10 pm by Unknown
Caballero (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIn the Matter of E.J.B. and R.S.B. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm by NARF
Playing catch-up: Laws protecting cultural property in the United States need an update. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm by Unknown
Traditional Village of Togiak (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Banishment) United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:16 am by Native American Rights Fund
Douglas A Ducey, et al (Motion to Compel - Closed Tribal Government Sessions)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlHamaatsa, Inc. v. [read post]