Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Susan V. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
The United Nations Human Rights Committee has expressed serious concerns about HK’s ‘seditious intention’ offences [paras 15,16]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm
United States (June 2023) was asked to review the issue again. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
Young v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:48 am
”Section 1519 states the penalty for a person who “knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
In Alden v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Correctional Admin., 892 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2018) (“materially changes” employment conditions in a manner “more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities”); Williams v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:31 am
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in the case Muldrow v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
In Easter v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:06 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
She told the justices that, on Jan. 6, 2021, a “violent mob stormed the United States Capitol and disrupted the peaceful transition of power. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
For example, in SEC v. [read post]
