Search for: "United States v. Alvarez" Results 141 - 160 of 660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 10:55 am by Samuel Moyn
The lifecycle of the ATS tracks almost exactly the lifecycle of the human rights movement in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In Kiobel, the Court held there was no jurisidiction over claims where all of the alleged relevant conduct occurred outside of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Tarnishment seems obviously gone.Incoherence in Alvarez about whether dilution is even distinguishable from confusion for constitutional purposes/lack of disavowal of USOC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am by assoulineberlowe
Judge Rodney Smith, the soon to be new federal judicial appointment by the President for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, denied Callado’s motion to dissolve the LPs, and Callado appealed. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am by Priscilla Smith
Lies and failures to inform in the medical context are different from lies in the course of political speech, as the Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2012’s United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Jane Bambauer
The 2012 Supreme Court opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm by Kenneth Anderson
That reach has included (up until Kiobel II) Chinese corporations and Russian oligarchs, irrespective of any contacts with the United States. [read post]