Search for: "United States v. Amato" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
Amato NASSAU COUNTYLand Use and PlanningCourt Finds Claim for Unconstitutionally Vague Ordinance Is Stated by Vendor Party Magic Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeFraud Convict Denied Bail Pending Appeal; Burdens of Proof on Claims Not Met United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
He eventually brought his case to the Supreme Court, relying upon a law, 42 U.S.C. 1982, written and passed by Congress that says: "All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every state and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Anthony Colangelo
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: Amato v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Amato , No. 06-5600, 06-5741, 07-2152, 07-2311 Convictions and sentences for series of frauds against several states and a corporation are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) refusing to grant a new trial based on the government's alleged withholding of impeachment material and newly discovered exculpatory evidence; 2) refusing to sever defendants' trials; 3) improperly instructing the jury as to the meaning of "false statements" and… [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Los Angeles businessman has been rewarded one of the largest Internet defamation awards ever. [read post]