Search for: "United States v. Any and All Radio Station Equipment"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm
EEO Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five or more full-time employees and located in Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas must place EEO Public File Reports in their OPIFs. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm
EEO Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five or more full-time employees and located in Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas must place EEO Public File Reports in their OPIFs. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:42 am
Rather, under the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:38 am
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five (5) or more full-time employees located in Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas must place EEO Public File Reports in their public inspection files. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
Any electronic device which intentionally emits radio frequency energy must be authorized before it can be marketed within the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:04 am
The decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Ahmed Bin Mubarak, Yemen’s ambassador to the United States, denied reports that his government had withdrawn permission for the United States to carry out ground missions, but made clear that “in the future there needs to be more coordination with Yemeni authorities before any operation and that there needs to be consideration for our sovereignty. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
The 2014 terrorist attack at the Kunming railway station did not amount to hostilities that might arguably trigger international humanitarian law rather than IHRL, as the attacks were not characterized by sufficient “intensity and organization” under Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
For example, following the district court’s decision in United Artists Television v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:39 pm
One notable example involved a report that researchers were able to remotely access a car and change the car’s air-conditioning settings, switch the volume and station on the radio, turn on the windshield wipers, and display a picture of the researchers on the digital dashboard screen from 10 miles away. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
Removing the standard provides no guidance at all, unless the Commission has signaled that it cannot anticipate a problem with any carrier offer to exempt specific types of traffic from debiting a monthly data allowance. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
Removing the standard provides no guidance at all, unless the Commission has signaled that it cannot anticipate a problem with any carrier offer to exempt specific types of traffic from debiting a monthly data allowance. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am
And he deplored as “wrong-headed” the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a radio interview that “Taiwan has not been a part of China. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am
In addition, the case relates to the arbitrary denial of a broadcasting license and the seizure of radio station equipment. [read post]
